Celtic in "advanced talks" to land Michut

Celtic have been monitoring a deal for Paris Saint-Germain midfielder Edouard Michut, according to reports.

What’s the word?

As per transfer guru Fabrizio Romano, the Scottish champions had been in “advanced talks” to sign the promising 19-year-old this summer, with the Ligue 1 side having given the move the green light after agreeing to sanction his departure.

Writing on Twitter about the Frenchman’s future, the respected insider stated: “Celtic are in advanced talks to sign Edouard Michut. Paris Saint-Germain are open to let him go – first proposal to be submitted soon, permanent deal now discussed. #CelticFC opening bid will be around €2.5m, as @SkySportsLyall advanced.”

This report has come as something of a bolt from the blue, with much of the recent gossip having been centred around a possible move for Argentinos Juniors starlet, Fausto Vera.

Any deal still does feel unlikely, however, with those at Football Scotland ruling out a transfer happening.

Big coup

Managing to sign a highly-rated prospect from arguably one of the most prominent clubs in European football would represent a major coup for Ange Postecoglou and co, with Michut having been tipped for big things during his time in France.

Likened to teammate Marco Veratti by some, the “highly technical” playmaker – as described by talent scout Jacek Kulig – has the quality to be a really exciting feature of the Hoops squad next term, with the club in need of a player who can unlock the door following the departure of long-serving midfielder, Tom Rogic.

While the £2.7m-rated gem has struggled to force his way into the first-team reckoning at the Parc des Princes – with just eight senior appearances to his name thus far – it is no doubt difficult to earn regular minutes among a stellar crop of talent, particularly with academy stars having long been overlooked by the French powerhouse.

Their loss could well be Postecoglou’s gain, however, with the “important” teenager – as described by Yohan Cabaye – a player who can blossom in the 56-year-old’s progressive and attacking style of play.

His youth would suggest that it may take time for him to truly make his mark at Parkhead, although in the coming years it could well prove a real astute piece of business, particularly for what looks to be a relative bargain price of around £2m.

The Glasgow side previously enjoyed great success poaching Odsonne Edouard from PSG, there’s no reason why young Michut can’t replicate such feats.

AND in other news – “Made contact with…”: Anthony Joseph drops Celtic transfer update, supporters will be gutted

Everton: Crook makes Winks interest claim

TalkSPORT reporter Alex Crook has provided his reaction to the Everton pursuit of midfielder Harry Winks. 

The lowdown: Toffees’ interested

This comes amidst reports linking Winks with a move to Goodison Park, potentially as part of a player plus cash deal that would see Richarlison head in the opposite direction.

The 26-year-old has fallen down the pecking order at Tottenham in recent times and Spurs could be willing to part company with another one of their English talents this summer, having already allowed Dele Alli to join the Blues in January.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/everton-news-7/” title=”Everton news!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

As Toffees boss Frank Lampard attempts to assemble an improved squad for 2022/23, Winks could now be on the radar on Merseyside regardless of what happens to Richarlison…

The latest: Crook on Winks

Speaking to Give Me Sport, Crook has claimed that Everton are very keen on signing the 10-cap England ace.

He said: “Harry Winks, reasonably cheap, good lad, good professional. I think he would be a good signing for anybody, and Everton are definitely interested.”

The verdict: No brainer

Formerly a regular feature under Mauricio Pochettino for Tottenham and Gareth Southgate for the Three Lions, the cultured midfielder could be a smart addition to the Goodison Park squad at the mooted £20million asking price if Lampard can kickstart a stuttering career.

Despite only making 30 fleeting appearances across all competitions last season, Winks – who was once lauded as being ‘like Xavi and (Andres) Iniesta’ by Pochettino – possesses a wealth of top-level experience that would be beneficial to the Everton ranks, particularly should Tom Davies follow Fabian Delph out of the exit door.

A formidable passer, the Englishman completed an impressive 88 per cent of all his attempted passes in the Premier League last term, making 30.3 on average per game and creating three big chances in 19 outings whilst earning a 6.84 Sofascore rating in the process (Sofascore).

In other news, this journalist is fretting after what he read about Richarlison

Liverpool: Romano drops Mane update

Journalist Fabrizio Romano has dropped a concerning update regarding the future of Liverpool forward, Sadio Mane…

What’s the word?

Writing on Twitter, the transfer insider has revealed that the Senegal international’s move to Bayern Munich has taken a step closer, with the 30-year-old having agreed personal terms with the Bundesliga outfit: “Sadio Mané has reached full verbal agreement with Bayern on personal terms. Three year contract ready – talks will enter into final stages with Liverpool, new bid set to be submitted.

“LFC are aware of his decision: Mané wants Bayern – and it’s really close now.”

[snack-amp-story url=”https://www.footballfancast.com/web-stories/read-the-latest-liverpool-news-transfer-rumours-gossip-salah-gnabry-isak-romano” title= “Read the latest Liverpool news!”]

This follows reports from the end of last month that revealed the former Southampton man is ‘expected’ to leave Anfield this summer, having also teased a potential exit while on international duty.

The long-serving forward – who joined the Merseyside club from the Saints back in 2016 in a £34m deal – has just a year remaining on his existing contract, hence the increased uncertainty over his future.

Klopp gutted

While the arrival of Benfica starlet Darwin Nunez has helped to somewhat soften the blow, Reds boss Jurgen Klopp will no doubt be gutted at the prospect of losing one of his key men this summer, with Mane having been instrumental in the club’s rise under the German.

Since his switch six years ago, the £63m-rated speedster has gone on to register a staggering 120 goals and a further 40 assists in 269 games in all competitions, notably winning the Champions League in 2019 and the Premier League title the following year.

Part of a ruthless and lethal forward line alongside Roberto Firmino and Mo Salah for much of his time at the club, the £200k-per-week machine has at times been overshadowed by the prolific Egyptian, yet his impact has certainly not gone unnoticed, with club legend Jamie Carragher full of praise for the way the winger has “sacrificed” for the team in recent years.

A relentless workhorse in Klopp’s remarkable side, the one-time Red Bull Salzburg man enjoyed yet another stellar campaign last time out, scoring 23 goals and providing five assists in all competitions as the Reds came within a whisker of winning an unprecedented quadruple, eventually settling for a domestic cup double after final day heartache and a European showpiece defeat to Real Madrid.

That most recent loss could well have been the 5 foot 9 marksman’s last game in a Liverpool shirt, with it looking like his fairytale run at the club is set to come to an end this summer.

That fact will be a bruising one for Klopp, not least due to his star asset’s potential destination, with the former Borussia Dortmund coach having routinely tussled with Bayern during his stint in charge in the Bundesliga.

The 55-year-old will not enjoy seeing the Bavarian giants getting one over on him…

AND in other news: Bid made: FSG now in LFC talks to land “world class” £60m “storm”, imagine him & Nunez

Rangers handed Cassierra boost

Rangers’ hopes of signing Mateo Cassierra this summer have been handed a boost after the striker reportedly revealed he was keen on a move to Ibrox.

What’s the word?

Rangers have been heavily linked with the Colombian striker in recent weeks and according to the 4th Official, a trusted insider, on Twitter, he wants to join Giovanni van Bronckhorst’s side ahead of next season.

They tweeted: ”When pressed on how close the move is in reality, I was told that the player has several options but Rangers is where Cassierra wants to move. But, Rangers would not be paying anywhere close to £8.5m for the striker.”

A big boost for Rangers?

The 25-year-old has enjoyed a fruitful spell during his time at PF Sochi, contributing 14 goals and six assists in just 23 appearances for the Russian League side.

Recent reports have suggested that they value him at £8.5m but given that his Transfermarkt value stands at just £4.05m and his contract is set to expire next summer, Rangers will surely be looking to negotiate a lower price.

Both Alfredo Morelos and Kemar Roofe only just hit double figures in the league for Rangers last season and after injury problems, van Bronckhorst was forced to start Joe Aribo up front for the Europa League final loss against Eintracht Frankfurt.

Therefore, a clinical striker could make all the difference for the Teddy Bears next season as they aim to go one step further in Europe, as well as reclaiming their place at the top of domestic football after relinquishing their Premiership title last season.

As well as impressing at Sochi, the 25-year-old forward has also enjoyed impressive spells with Deportivo Cali and Ajax’s youth sides, where he was prolific with 42 goals, so he clearly knows where the back of the net is and could be a superb addition to van Bronckhorst’s attacking options next season.

If Cassierra is indeed keen on a switch to Ibrox, then director of football Ross Wilson should act quickly to bring him in, before other European sides begin to take notice of the Colombian’s impressive form in Russia.

And, in other news… After Goldson: Mark Guidi promises more good news for Rangers supporters

Everton plot move for James Tarkowski

Everton are plotting a move for Burnley centre-back James Tarkowski as Frank Lampard looks to strengthen his defence ahead of next season.

What’s the word?

According to 90min, Everton and Leicester City have joined the chase for the Burnley defender following their Premier League relegation.

The 29-year-old is out of contract this summer and will surely remain in the top flight following the events of Sunday which confirmed Burnley’s exit after seven years.

Everton could face a mighty battle to secure his signature, with the events that happened this season, the Englishman may fancy a side that has a greater chance of European football.

Tarkowski can be an upgrade on Michael Keane

Everton conceded 66 goals in the league this season, the fifth-worst total and this is something both Farhad Moshiri and Lampard urgently needs to address if they don’t want a repeat of this season’s relegation battle next year.

By signing Tarkowski, they could get an immediate upgrade on fellow Englishman Keane. The Burnley defender has made and won more tackles (71 and 42) compared to Keane (49 and 35), whilst also applying more pressures (261 to 228).

With almost double the numbers of blocks (92 to 51) and more interceptions (72 to 62) it’s clear to see why the 29-year-old would be a better option than Keane.

Keane has a WhoScored average rating of 6.72 and wins on average, three aerials per match. Tarkowski on the other hand is ranked first in the Burnley squad on the average rating (6.97) and wins a mammoth 4.4 aerials per match.

The stats prove that on a free transfer, Tarkowski would represent a wonderful piece of business, especially with Everton’s defensive woes this season.

He has been described as a “rock” by Alex James in the past and if he does want a move to Goodison, he could well ask for a pay rise on his current £70k-per-week deal he has at the moment.

AND in other news, Lampard plotting Everton bid for £158k-p/w dynamo, he’d be a “joy to watch”

Aston Villa: Ollie Watkins a doubt against Crystal Palace

Aston Villa striker Ollie Watkins only has an outside chance of featuring against Crystal Palace this afternoon due to injury.

The Lowdown: Injury scare

Watkins, who Gregg Evans labelled as the ‘real deal’ back in 2020, has been a regular this season, missing just one Premier League game under Steven Gerrard.

[web_stories_embed url=”https://www.footballtransfertavern.com/web-stories/aston-villa-latest-updates/” title=”Aston Villa latest updates!” poster=”” width=”360″ height=”600″ align=”none”]

The 26-year-old has attracted interest from West Ham as a result of his displays this season, scoring 10 times in 32 top-flight fixtures.

The England international picked up an ankle injury in the 2-1 defeat to Liverpool on Tuesday, and it looks as if he may not recover in time for the clash with Patrick Vieira’s side this afternoon.

The Latest: Preece’s post

Villa correspondent Ashley Preece relayed injury updates from Gerrard’s pre-match press conference on Twitter, one of which was on Watkins.

The forward was yet to train as a result of his ankle issue and only has an outside chance of featuring against Palace. However, there was some good news, with Jacob Ramsey set to be back in the squad following a groin problem.

The Verdict: Options

Gerrard has gone with three different systems in Villa’s last four Premier League games, and this update on Watkins could result in more tactical changes.

He stuck with a 4-3-1-2 formation against Liverpool, however, with Watkins a doubt, he may have to resort back to either a 4-3-3 or 4-3-2-1, with a winger coming in for Watkins and Danny Ings going as a lone striker.

Club-record signing Emiliano Buendia was on the bench last time out, so perhaps he’ll come back into the XI, or Bertrand Traore is another option after replacing Watkins in the week.

In other news: NSWE now close to agreeing deal for another midfielder alongside Coutinho.  

West Indies gambled on Russell's knees and it hasn't worked

The idea was to use him as a wicket-taking force, in short, sharp bursts, and as a demonic hitter. It hasn’t quite panned out that way

Jarrod Kimber24-Jun-2019Mashrafe Mortaza is a warrior, a fighter. That’s what his coaches call him. For an age he has battled knee injuries that should have kept him out of the game. Ryan Harris was much the same; one of his last Tests he won struggling through the crease to beat South Africa, erasing the last bits of cartilage from his knees. They are heroes just for getting to the crease.Andre Russell is not seen as one. Some fans have accused him of being soft, of faking his injuries, or of doing it all for attention. Every limp, tumble or early exit from the ground is met with someone doubting his sincerity.Russell has himself to blame for some of this. The drugs ban did not help. And he has also not been available for long periods because of problems with Cricket West Indies and because he wanted to make more money in franchise cricket.Of course, Mortaza might have been tempted to be a T20 star had he been in more demand, and Harris was a well paid player for Australia – who once signed as a Kolpak in England. Shane Warne and Shoaib Akhtar both had suspensions under drug violations, which did not seem to lessen fans’ appreciation.But despite all that, many will never forgive Russell for prioritising T20 over everything else. He may be one of the most entertaining and skilled players around but he is also one of the most polarising.A different Russell was on show this World Cup. Cricket’s most spectacular athlete came into the tournament injured. West Indies took a gamble on him regardless, and he spent more time off the field than on it. His body is not up to ten overs, or even six or seven, but his team need him, and he bowled through pain, went on and off the field, and occasionally fell at the crease, only to keep coming in again.

Russell has taken a wicket every 23 balls, and almost every time he has been on, West Indies have looked a better team. He is not as fast as Shannon Gabriel or Oshane Thomas, but he is a smarter bowler, and always a wicket-taking threat

West Indies gambled on him. Russell gambled on his future. And before West Indies are officially out of the tournament, Russell is going home.***”How many overs did Andre Russell bowl? You were the one who said he was injured. I saw him bowl every time the captain asked him to bowl, and he looked like getting wickets every time the captain asked him to bowl.” That was West Indies assistant coach Roddy Estwick after a journalist asked about Russell’s fitness following the loss to Bangladesh.Estwick is a retired fast bowler with retired fast bowler’s knees. He knows Russell is crocked, because he has eyes, but he also knows that Russell has been available almost every time they have asked him. Sure, his run-up became a hobble-up, his follow-through included a limp, and he was stationary during some of his fielding efforts. But he did what West Indies wanted in this tournament; they wanted him to bat in the middle order and deliver some overs.He was in the team to hit the ball a long way and to take wickets. No one was expecting him to bowl ten overs or construct patient innings. In 56 ODIs he has only ever bowled out his full quota seven times. West Indies were looking for an impact player, and Russell is that.ALSO READ: ‘Sometimes the ball goes for six even if I’ve not timed it, because of the work I’ve put in’He was one of the greatest athletes in cricket. Lithe but powerful, like a tall super-middleweight boxer. The Russell of today is not like that. He is far bigger than before – bulkier; his thighs and shoulders have grown and he is built more like a baseball slugger than the Russell of before. There is more of him, and it all seems to move slower.And there are his knees. The problem with them seems to be a lack of cartilage, like with Harris and Mortaza. Kapil Dev had his cartilage removed when he was playing, and he believes it cost him five to seven years of bowling.Fast bowling is a cruel thing to put a healthy body through. There is a large amount of force going through the front leg on initial contact, which needs be absorbed by ankle-joint motion or knee-joint flexion. The problem for Kapil, Harris and Mortaza was, their natural shock absorbers were not there or were greatly diminished, which means the femur was crashing into the tibia. Harris kept bowling until his tibia cracked from the pressure.Unlike other knee injuries, like tears to your anterior cruciate or medial collateral ligaments, you can continue to bowl with no cartilage; you just do it with pain.1:51

Defiant Andre Russell looking to prove a point

One thing you hear about Russell from some doubters is: “He can’t be that injured if he’s bowling at 90 miles an hour.” But they’re wrong. Harris remained quick right until the end. And Mortaza’s speed has dropped only a few miles an hour over a decade or so of knee trouble. You can still bowl; it just hurts. Chances are Russell and Mortaza will both need knee replacements when they are older. Both of them move as if they need them now.In T20 cricket Russell’s primary skill these days is batting. In this World Cup he only batted three innings and faced 29 balls. The batting he does is literally hit or miss; three chances are probably not enough. The one time he got a start was against Australia, and he let Mitchell Starc play on his ego then.Where he was good was with the ball. Against Pakistan they only needed Russell for three overs, in which he took two wickets. Pakistan fell apart so quickly that using Russell again was pointless. The time they really needed him was against Australia.In his first spell there, he took the wicket of Usman Khawaja, after he hit the batsman. That original spell was only three overs, and Australia were in huge trouble. But Russell had also taken a tumble when he bowled.It’s not that uncommon for some bowlers to fall; Mark Wood spends a great deal of time watching the batsman from the turf. But with Russell’s knees, any big knock and they seem to stiffen up. He gingerly delivered one more over and then went off the ground, with West Indies on top.But they didn’t stay on top. Twenty overs later Australia were doing well again, so Russell came back. Straightaway he took the wicket of Alex Carey – playing perhaps his best knock for Australia. In the same over he almost had Nathan Coulter-Nile twice.Before the tournament, West Indies had talked about the plan to bowl Russell in short, sharp spells. They were using someone who really hadn’t played ODI cricket since 2015 and had a horrible knee injury, so it was obvious. Also, to get the most pace out of Russell – even when he is fully fit – short spells are best.

Fast bowling is a cruel thing to put a healthy body through. There is a large amount of force going through the front leg on initial contact, which needs be absorbed by ankle-joint motion or knee-joint flexion

West Indies – Russell included – also knew that with Coulter-Nile in, they had almost finished Australia. They were so close to victory. So Russell bowled another over. And another. As he started his fourth over on the trot, the press box started looking around, confused. When he came on for his fifth, it felt like West Indies were gambling their entire campaign on this spell. After each over Holder asked him how he was doing, Russell told him he was fine and that he could bowl one more.In that fifth over, Russell was hit for six by Coulter-Nile. He started the day over 140kph, scaring Khawaja; he ended it around 130, hobbling, being flicked for six by a man who had never scored over 70 in a professional match. It may have been worth a try, but it didn’t work.The next game, Russell was left out, which hardly mattered as the rain came down. Against England, Russell came back, and after West Indies made a low total, came on to bowl second change.His first over was the eighth. He shouldn’t have been bowling. His first two balls were poor, he only got any real pace up once, and he hobbled into the field. He didn’t come back on until the 11th over (like they wanted to give him one extra over of rest). The last ball of this over was a great bouncer that knocked Jonny Bairstow to the ground. But Russell fell to the surface too. Batsman and bowler had to be seen to. Bairstow batted on; Russell left the field.ALSO READ: Andre Russell’s fast show ignites World Cup for West IndiesIt was clear from very early on that England would make the total with ease. There was no reason for Russell to bowl again, but towards the end of England’s chase he came back on the field and told the captain he was available to bowl.Before the Bangladesh game, Russell didn’t even make it to training. For that match, West Indies chose to use him ahead of Carlos Brathwaite.Brathwaite’s hundred against New Zealand probably made the decision easier for West Indies to send Russell home. With Brathwaite they get fielding, some decent line and length, and his own inconsistent, magnificent striking. The reason they opted for Russell in the first place is that Russell hits more often, and he has that extra pace.West Indies believed their speed and height could take teams down this World Cup – and Russell was a part of that strategy. Russell has taken a wicket every 23 balls, and almost every time he was on, West Indies looked a better team. He is not as fast as Shannon Gabriel or Oshane Thomas, but he is a smarter bowler, and always a wicket-taking threat.***Against Bangladesh the West Indies openers are leaking runs, so Russell comes on first change. His first over goes for two; in his second he has the wicket of Soumya Sarkar. One over later, he is off the field.Ten overs later, he pulls up before even delivering his first ball. He jogs back to his mark, although “jogging” might be overstating it. He falls over again when bowling and has to be helped up. After the over, he pauses mid-pitch, doubled over in pain, before trudging to midwicket. He continues to bowl, and as he heads back to his mark, Holder runs over and tries to gee him up; it would have been better if he had held him up.When one quick short ball flies past the edge, Russell jumps in anticipation, thinking it was a wicket, but when he lands, you can almost hear the clang of his knees. He limps through an over and then leaves the field. The walk takes forever, and he can’t even lift his legs properly over the padded triangles at the boundary.A Russell bouncer to Bairstow knocked both batsman and bowler down, but one stayed down longer•Getty ImagesWhen he comes back on, it is only to field. A ball is hit past him, and he runs after it, but it’s not really running, and it won’t work. A short while later a ball is mishit towards him – it floats up the way completely clunked cricket shots can do. Most the fielders on the field – Chris Gayle included – would have got to it. Russell doesn’t even get close.***Russell’s earnings per year are not publicly available. Many T20 teams and leagues pay guys at his level under the table. In the last year he has played IPL, PSL, BPL, T10, Global T20 and APL. His salary, before bonuses or sponsors, is probably around US$2 million.Russell is 31, and his body severely limits the number of years he can earn this kind of money. Because of his suspension under the drug code, he has already missed a year. If he can’t bowl, he can become a middle-order hitter on the T20 circuit and stick around for a while, but without his all-round package, he won’t be as in demand, nor paid as much.Given West Indian cricketers are among the lowest paid of the major nations, he is not at the World Cup for the money. While there are no other paydays he will miss out on – most cricket shuts down for ICC events – by playing here he is putting future earnings in doubt through injury or general wear and tear. Not to mention the damage he is doing to his knees beyond his cricket career.Before the England game Russell batted in the nets for a long time. But he also spent just as long with the physio. His body looked like a car being used for parts, more than that of a functioning cricketer. Almost no one was in the nets; the pain he was showing wasn’t for show.It’s easy to look down on the multimillionaire player who fell afoul of drug regulations and who wasn’t always available for his team. But the easiest thing for Russell to have done would have been to stay at home and ice his knees in preparation for his next massive payday.Instead, he tried, he fell, and the gamble hasn’t worked.

A long build-up of bad faith

Before they can talk details, Cricket Australia and the Australian Cricketers Association must end an increasingly toxic cycle and find a way to be able to talk at all

Daniel Brettig16-May-2017In explaining the landscape in which the catastrophic 1994-95 Major League Baseball lockout took place, the columnist George F Will stated that bitterness and suspicion between league owners and the players’ union “festered because a number of owners frankly were unreconciled to not just the behaviour of the union but the existence of the union”.The result of that bitterness, and the refusal of either side to back down over the league’s insistence on imposing a salary cap, was the loss of the entire post-season for 1994, including the World Series, and part of the following season too. When baseball did resume, after 232 days, the owners were court-ordered to continue under the game’s former revenue-sharing arrangement, while players and teams alike slipped enormously in public esteem. The result? Huge declines in attendance, ratings and revenue – estimated to have cost the MLB more than US$700 million.For 20 years Australian cricket has sailed through without even the faintest whiff of a similar standoff, but now Cricket Australia and the Australian Cricketers’ Association stand, as Will put it, at “daggers drawn”. Their disagreement over the current fixed-revenue-percentage model – CA wants to get rid of it, the ACA to retain it – is the key technical point at issue. But the inability of either party to communicate effectively with the other is the greater problem, one with roots going back at least five years.Two key events took place in 2012 to set the scene. First, the most recent MOU was agreed to by CA’s chief executive, James Sutherland, and his ACA equivalent, Paul Marsh. In 1998, Sutherland had been, alongside Marsh’s predecessor Tim May, the chief architect of a model that ensured players received around 26% of Australian Cricket Revenue each year, divided up between international, state and Big Bash League players.

Three elements pay talks need to acknowledge

  • Australian cricket does need more grass-roots money. Cricket Australia will soon release an audit of all facilities around the country that will illustrate numerous problem areas, including a lack of adequate change rooms for women. Equally CA is mindful of matching the AFL’s vast game-development resources in each state.

  • Women need pay equity. The WBBL has already shown how quickly the women’s game can grow with some marketing and television muscle. Greater financial incentives for the players, allowing full professionalism, will accelerate that process.

  • Domestic men do contribute to financial returns. The Sheffield Shield is Australian cricket’s equivalent of research and development, while the BBL is soon to bring in vastly increased amounts via the next TV rights deal. A broad pay base is also in the game’s interest by making cricket less of a gamble for prospective players – an area where the AFL has always held an edge.

“We believe that this agreement and its player-payment model strikes a strong balance,” Sutherland said of the 2012 model, which added a variable, performance-based component. “Players are well rewarded for playing senior representative cricket within a system that emphasises accountability for performance and ensures the right players are receiving the right payments at the right times.”At the time of that agreement, Sutherland and the CA board chairman, Wally Edwards, were engaged in a project aimed at revolutionising the governance of the game down under, and also its financial model. The board was to move from a hodgepodge of 14 state representatives to an independent body of nine corporate governors. Meanwhile the financial model changed from states each receiving an equal portion of television revenue, balanced by gate receipts in the larger states, to each association receiving a fixed amount, with CA distributing to rest on a strategic basis. The upshot of all this was far more central control and unified strategy in Australian cricket.CA’s AGM in October 2012 heralded the start of the new regime, including the arrival of three independent directors – two of whom were David Peever, the former Rio Tinto managing director in Australia, and Kevin Roberts, former global senior vice-president of Adidas and a Sheffield Shield cricketer for NSW. The new directors were referred to as “captains of industry”. Peever held strong industrial-relations views, and had spoken at a mining conference that year in favour of direct engagement between companies and employees, “without the competing agenda of a third party constantly seeking to extend its reach into areas best left to management”.Peever became CA chairman late in 2015, around 18 months after Marsh had decided to quit the ACA to take up the role of chief executive for the AFL Players’ Association, following a rapid deterioration in his relationship with Sutherland. In that same year Marsh had been a key consigliere for Sutherland, Edwards and the team performance manager Pat Howard in the decision to replace Mickey Arthur with Darren Lehmann, a former ACA president, as Australia’s coach. Over the years, Marsh and Sutherland often played golf together.Marsh’s value in helping CA reach a decision that would reap rich rewards in the home summer of 2013-14 was ignored when an ACA “state of the game” report hit CA desks. As a document it was ignored, even ridiculed, for segments, including a proposal to move the BBL to October. Marsh was rounded on by Sutherland and state CEOs at one of their regular meetings. Marsh, bruised, walked out; he would soon find himself moving to the AFLPA.What next became clear was that this fracture would not be repaired when Marsh’s replacement, Alistair Nicholson, joined the ACA. A former key defender for the Melbourne Football Club, Nicholson had worked at the sports marketing firm Gemba, and had plenty to learn about the intricacies of the cricket landscape when he arrived. The death of Phillip Hughes provided a major initial jolt, but Nicholson’s work with Sutherland during that harrowing time did not grow into a relationship. The pair have never interacted outside official channels.In 2015, Roberts moved from the CA board to join the board’s executive management team. He appeared a standout candidate to replace Sutherland as chief executive whenever the incumbent made way. There was an echo of Sutherland’s beginnings, too, in Roberts’ appointment as the lead MOU negotiator for CA, sidelining Howard.CA’s strategic decision around this time was to create distance from the ACA, while attempting to get closer to the players. Internally and externally the ACA was increasingly characterised as “the opposition”. Female players, for a long time ignored financially by both CA and the ACA, were brought into the fold with rapidly improving contracts negotiated directly. Senior male players were courted with the sorts of social occasions never afforded to the ACA – most notably a dinner held by the board last November, at which the national captain Steven Smith and his deputy, David Warner, joined Lehmann and looming pay talks were discussed.Meanwhile CA’s board, management and negotiating team drew up their own pay model for the next five years, breaking up the fixed revenue-sharing model and freezing wages for domestic players. Women were to again be given a pay hike, but only the top male and female players would be entitled to anything above fixed wages.Unlike in the past, CA viewed their new model, rather than the existing agreement, as the “starting point” for talks. Similarly, the board openly questioned why they were funding the ACA via annual grant, to the tune of around A$4 million.The pay structure for cricketers on the men’s domestic circuit is a major point of contention in the current dispute•Getty ImagesPeever has always pushed the increase of grass-roots investment and greater equity for women as the touchstones of his chairmanship, dating back to an interview with the in November 2015: “I think about the tens of thousands of volunteers who help our game. You don’t get the Steve Smiths and Meg Lannings unless you have a strong foundation. You have to keep driving hard at the grass roots.” The board’s pay offer states that extra money can be found for grass roots, and other areas like the growth of CA’s media unit, by breaking up the MOU model.Things came to a head for the first time last December, during the Gabba Test between Australia and Pakistan. The acrimony centred around the leaking of emails about a pregnancy clause in contracts for women, with the ACA openly questioning the legality of the clause. CA responded by suspending talks until the new year, cutting time from the process while intensifying suspicion and mistrust on both sides.When they did resume, the two parties continued to talk across, rather than to, each other. CA’s formal pay offer added more detail to their original proposal but did not deviate from a path charted long ago in the boardroom at Jolimont. The ACA response likewise did not budge from the players’ strong view that a fixed revenue-percentage model must remain.Impatience at the process was relayed to CA’s management, including Sutherland and Roberts, at board and state CEOs’ meetings held in Brisbane last week. But the ink had barely dried on the minutes from the board meeting by the time the next escalation began – each effort pushed back by the ACA.First, Australia’s top five players were offered multi-year deals by Howard, something all rejected without a second thought. Secondly, Roberts spoke icily to Nicholson at last Thursday’s scheduled meeting between the negotiating teams, reinforcing a “take it or leave it” position. Thirdly, Sutherland’s letter to Nicholson offered the threat of unemployment for all players out of contract if the ACA did not cave in before the June 30 deadline. The ACA’s recent request for mediation was rebuffed with the contention that “they didn’t agree to it in the first place”. Tit for tat.On Sunday, the board director Mark Taylor offered insight into CA’s thinking in his other role as a Nine commentator. “It doesn’t make business sense for Cricket Australia,” he said. “Every time you make money you have to give away a certain percentage of it. The costs of revenue are going up in sport all the time, every sport will say that.”If these acts were intended to cause players to quake, they appear to have done very much the opposite, as attested by Warner. There remains the chance of negotiation, perhaps encouraged by the looming announcement of a pay deal between the AFL and Marsh’s AFLPA. But there is also now the possibility of a thoroughly damaging stand-off, in which Australian cricketers fall out of contract and look elsewhere for opportunities, both to play and make commercial deals.Avoiding further ugliness would require the reversal inside six weeks of a toxic cycle of deteriorating relations that has taken far longer to build up. Those familiar with the poisonous 1994-95 MLB lockout will already be bracing themselves.

Pujara's technique, Rohit's attitude, Piedt's action

Sanjay Manjrekar has his say on day one of the Delhi Test, where India ended the day on 231 for 7 despite being 139 for 6 at one point

ESPNcricinfo staff03-Dec-2015’Pitch crumbly, but not as vicious’With all the focus on pitches since the beginning of the Test series in Mohali, Feroz Shah Kotla fielded a track Manjrekar called the ‘best so far in the series’ as their appears to be something for the batsmen too.1:49

Manjrekar: Pitch crumbly, but not as vicious

‘Pujara getting bowled despite solid technique’India got off to a cautious start after winning the toss but No. 3 Cheteshwart Pujara was bowled again. Manjrekar believes Pujara might be taking his eyes off the ball, thinking too much about the outcome instead.2:10

Manjrekar: Pujara getting bowled despite solid technique

‘Will be tough for Rohit to retain his place’The familiarity with Indian batsmen’s dismissals continued as Rohit Sharma holed out to long-on with an unnecessary heave. Manjrekar said if Rohit doesn’t score big in the second innings, he will find it tough to retain his place in the Test side.1:58

Manjrekar: Will be tough for Rohit to retain his place

‘Uncomplicated action helps Piedt’s accuracy’From South Africa, the day belonged to offspinner Dane Piedt. He took four of the seven wickets and Manjrekar said it’s the bowler’s smooth and uncomplicated action that helps him even though he does not give too many revolutions on the ball.1:34

Manjrekar: Uncomplicated action helps Piedt’s accuracy

‘Tahir struggles to fit in Amla’s plans’The other spinner – Imran Tahir – bowled only seven overs compared to Piedt’s 34. Manjrekar believes Tahir finds it difficult to fit in Hashim Amla’s plans of stifling the opposition batsmen.1:39

Manjrekar: Tahir struggles to fit in Amla’s plans

The father-son trap, coin-tosses, and the baseball cricketers

Bizarre numbers, massive mismatches and a dose of trivia from the Asian Games 2014

Bishen Jeswant03-Oct-20140 Number of matches* that Kuwait men’s team won to qualify for the quarter-finals of this Asian Games. They lost to Nepal and had their game against Maldives washed out. However, they were awarded the match based on a coin-toss.6 Number of top-eight Sri Lanka batsmen who were dismissed for single figures in their Asian Games quarter-final against South Korea at the Yeonhui Cricket Ground. South Korea join Australia, South Africa and New Zealand as the only teams to have inflicted this fate on Sri Lanka.58 The age of Bastaki Mahmoud, the Kuwait cricket team’s captain at this Asian Games. His son, Bastaki Fahad, 23, is the vice-captain of the team. In Kuwait’s quarter-final against Bangladesh, they came together to dismiss Tamim Iqbal, who pulled a waist-high full toss delivered by son Fahad straight to father Mahmoud at square leg.20 The score for which Kuwait were bowled out against Nepal. They went exactly one better in the quarter-final against Bangladesh, where they scored 21. No Kuwait batsman reached double figures in either game. Kuwait lost the quarter-final by 203 runs. The biggest margin of victory in an official T20 is 172 – Sri Lanka v Kenya in the 2007 World T20.4 Number of consecutive wickets that China’s Zhong Wenyi took in as many balls, in their Group A match against South Korea. Wenyi took a wicket off the last ball of the eighth over and wickets of the first three balls of the tenth over. The only bowlers to take four wickets in four balls in official T20 cricket are Andre Russell and Al-Amin Hossain.

Baseball stances, and more coin-tosses

  • The manner in which the tournament was structured meant Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, the two top-ranked teams in the tournament, could not have faced off in the final. Both teams received a ‘bye’, and were straight through to the quarter-finals. The fixtures were such that they were slotted to meet each other in the semis if they won their respective quarter-final games, which they did. That semi-final was marred by rain, but Sri Lanka progressed to the final based on another coin-toss.
  • Some of South Korea’s batsmen shaped up to face the bowling with a baseball-style stance, having their bats raised over their shoulders. This was not just a coincidence because, according to the , as many as seven of the 11 men that played – and lost – the opening match against Malaysia were baseball players – baseball is a passion in Korea, which won the gold medal in the event at the 2008 Olympics in Beijing. The cricket team was assembled especially for the Asian Games less than two years previously, with some of the players taking to the sport just six months before the games.

*